Autore: root
-
2+2=4: Why Science Is a Bulwark of Freedom
There’s a thread that links Galileo to Orwell: defending the obvious when the obvious becomes inconvenient.In 1984 everything collapses to a single question: 2+2=5 (for the arrogance of power) or 2+2=4 (for the objectivity of facts)? That is exactly why science safeguards freedom: facts do not depend on authority. Today, in an information ecosystem that…
-
“Revolution”: A Word Borrowed from Physics
The term revolution is today used to describe radical shifts in culture or politics, but it’s important to remember that the word itself was borrowed from physics. In astronomy, a revolution describes the orbit of a celestial body around another: the Earth revolves around the Sun. This simple scientific fact, once revealed and accepted, led…
-
🧪 Is Nature Really Unnatural? Or Physicists’s Models Could be Wrong?
After years of attending high-energy physics conferences, I’ve grown increasingly frustrated with one recurring argument — repeated like a mantra: “The universe must be unnatural.” The so-called naturalness problem is everywhere. If a theory doesn’t match observations without extreme fine-tuning, it’s not the theory that gets questioned — it’s nature itself. This logic has become…
-
🌀 The mystery of Dirac Quantization, and the Intrinsecally Cyclic Nature of Time
In everyday life and classical mathematics, the order of operations often doesn’t matter. If you buy 4 items that cost 3 euros each, or 3 items at 4 euros, it makes no difference: 4×3−3×4=0. This is called commutativity — the idea that A×B=B×A. It’s so fundamental we rarely question it. But in quantum mechanics, this…
-
📜 Galileo’s First Opponents Were Not in the Church, but in Academia
When we think of Galileo’s struggles, the image that usually comes to mind is that of a lone scientist silenced by the power of the Church. The Inquisition, the trial, the sentence to house arrest — these are the defining episodes in the popular narrative. But the historical record reveals something far less obvious, and…
-
Bell doesn’t Play Dice! The Classical Origin of Quantum Entanglement
New peer-reviewed publication in Quantum Studies: Mathematics and Foundations 📄 “Study on the Classical Mechanical Origin of Quantum Entanglement”🖋️ Donatello Dolce | Accepted: August 2025 Can quantum entanglement emerge from a classical-geometrical mechanism?This peer-reviewed study proposes a novel classical explanation for quantum entanglement based on periodic boundary conditions (PBCs) in space-time. It demonstrates how correlated…
-
⏳ Every Particle is a Clock – In Honor of Louis de Broglie
In 1924, Louis de Broglie began his PhD thesis with a simple but revolutionary idea: “To each isolated parcel of energy E, one may associate a periodic phenomenon of periodicity T=h/E. This hypothesis is the basis of our theory: it is worth as much, like all hypotheses, as can be deduced from its consequences.”— L.…
-
🔮 Theoretical Physics or Modern Alchemy?
There’s something deeply curious about how theoretical physics is often done today. Many popular frameworks — from Supersymmetry to String Theory, to certain cosmological models — seem astonishingly precise… until you realize they only work after fine-tuning dozens of arbitrary parameters. It’s as if the purpose were not to explain reality, but to hide inconsistencies…
-
What If Time Is Cyclic? The Implications of a Physics Grounded yet alien idea of Intrinsic Periodicity
Assuming my formulation is correct — as rigorously demonstrated across 20 peer-reviewed publications — then the implications are both foundational and far-reaching across all of theoretical physics. No counterexample or internal inconsistency has ever been identified. Everything is logically coherent, physically well-motivated, and mathematically cross-checked. So unless someone seriously attempts to falsify the hypothesis of…
-
Between Science and Noise: How to Tell Serious Physics from Pseudoscience
In the era of open science and AI-generated content, revolutionary ideas in physics have become more visible than ever—but so have misleading ones. Web platforms, as well as free publishing tools powered by artificial intelligence, now allow anyone to present their ideas with an academic appearance. This has created a curious paradox: never before has…
-
How the Arrow of Time Emerges from Cycles
Is time truly linear — or could its flow be a large-scale illusion? In Elementary Cycles Theory (ECT), time is not a continuous river, but a tapestry of ultra-fast microscopic cycles. Every elementary particle is described as an internal clock, its intrinsic time recurrence determined by its energy via de Broglie’s relation. This periodicity is…
-
The Real Paradox of Elementary Cycles Theory: A Discovery in Full View — but Like Galileo’s Telescope, Eyes Turn Away
The only real paradox in my theory is not found in the mathematics. It’s not in the physics either — which is rigorously derived, peer-reviewed, and published across more than 20 academic papers. The paradox is in the response: or rather, the lack of one. Elementary Cycles Theory offers something extraordinary — a unified description…
-
Too Simple to Believe, Too Radical to Ignore: the Dilemma of Sceptics Pretending to not Admit a Revolutionary Idea
What happens when a new theory is dismissed as both obvious and heretical? This is the paradox I face in disseminating Elementary Cycles Theory. When I speak of de Broglie recurrences, many physicists shrug: “Of course — we’ve known that since 1924.” When I suggest that time is cyclic, others recoil: “Impossible! That would violate…